GarryJolleyRogers - Wed Nov 25 2009 - Version 1.4
Parent topic: NameForStandard
(This is a discussion area based on the previous extensive discussions in person and on the email list, documented in NameForStandard.)
I think we just have to come out with some really personal choices. I held myself back partly because I did like the idea (first raised by Chuck) to forge a family of multiple tdwg standards that have a common naming pattern. I proposed this in the plenary summary discussion in Lisbon (twdg 2003) but the other groups were not very enthusiastic. So, we are free to choose.
Anyway, my preferences are:
1.
2.
3.
4.
(or
Please add your hitlists, maybe something will emerge!
Gregor Hagedorn - 21 Nov 2003